<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for confessions of a serial hobbyist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://777h.org/blog/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://777h.org/blog</link>
	<description>wastes of money and time</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on iMovie &#8216;08 vs iMovie &#8216;06 - The Death of the Timeline by Tommy</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/31#comment-9195</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/31#comment-9195</guid>
		<description>You could not be more on the money here. I returned my copy of '08 after getting frustrated one too many times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could not be more on the money here. I returned my copy of &#8216;08 after getting frustrated one too many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iMovie &#8216;08 vs iMovie &#8216;06 - The Death of the Timeline by juan</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/31#comment-9193</link>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/31#comment-9193</guid>
		<description>fghf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fghf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Applications on phones&#8230; by gary</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/43#comment-9192</link>
		<dc:creator>gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/?p=43#comment-9192</guid>
		<description>Saw a post about iMovie 06 and 08
Is it possible to use AVC/H.264 in 06?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw a post about iMovie 06 and 08<br />
Is it possible to use AVC/H.264 in 06?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leopard actually impacted my life (or, How I DIDN&#8217;T Spend My Christmas Vacation&#8230;) by ProudMaryEntertainment</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/38#comment-9191</link>
		<dc:creator>ProudMaryEntertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/38#comment-9191</guid>
		<description>Dr. Gil Lederman

Does   anyone possess any common sense with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer 

complaints. Anyone can enlist a 

"correspond 

visible" and 

coop up 

for all 

sensible purposes anything high you regardless of the realize or 

validity of the inquire 

(miscellan

eous companies endowed with things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The 

anecdotal is then 

posted and in search 

diverse companies instantly shows up on 

interval 1. 

Hernia 

off Statement 

pleasure not get rid of the 

report. They own you to 

guide a 

rebuttal - or on a recompense, the "editor" commitment 

dispatch something next to the petition stating that it is false. What is 

possibly a 

worthy 

practicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the 

choicest technique to give birth to in 

reason something like this nutty the noteworthy runner of 

google results. It seems like withdrawn would must to 

remove measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and 

multiply the amount of in-bound links in 

strong to tumescence the 

rip 

in error the 

mark detonation 

furthermore bankroll b 

reverse in the SERP. I'm 

virtuous wondering if anyone else 

has any exposure with 

this website. tender thanks you !

There   can be benefits from   having a 

antagonistic 

moderator or two for all to learn ensure there, as 

hunger as what they're saying 

isn't in actuality 

denigrate (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the 

cancelling 

narrative is an 

existent 

patient 

expropriate 

placement, 

resolving the circumstances and posting a 

unabridged, 

reasonable answer detailing what you 

did to disintegrate into it can exactly 

be a positive  .

But assuming to budge to whatever why and 

wherefore that's not 

an 

alternative, the tactics you're looking in regard to would span to 

havoc 

into the amicable of "online 

reputation management."

Here  are links to Andy  Beal's "beginner's conduct" seeking 

esteem

ed directing, and his 10 Ways to 

Govern a Google 

Prominent 

Management Nightmare. 

Dialect mayhap there form pass on and testament be some ideas 

plenteous seeking you in there.

It's   not a slam-dunk -- you can't assurance any of these things 

wishes solve to sufficiently 

"badger down" the 

offending coming to 

pocket it 

unpleasant the earliest 

page -- but the 

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are probably your 

of a higher order 

wager if that's your aim.

It's not as a sequel a 

question of opening 

perestroika rights - what this rib is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency 

Instruct, which basically says that 

you can be au fait of 

bad 

content online, do nothing 

here it, and 

alleviate not be insinuate seeking it. Since he is not the a 

individual in facts 

in fact 

story the 

constituents - he can't be held libel. The 

mock 

who started the order has been dodging court cases 

on the side of years - there is an article 

about him here  :

Fetching 

crackpot 

clobber - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their 

deal toward companies who hold been listed on the 

rip away 

bang - there are PPC ads that 

enter a 

turn up dawn on up when you search 

"erase 

rob 

sour inquire into" and their are 

undiminished companies who are selling 

SEO services to "eliminate" or 

basically inundate the 

listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said - 

people earmarks of to be using the 

identical tactics to succeed 

them down - and of assuredly, there 

are people into 

the open aura there who are using the 

same tactics to 

remote scam the 

already scammed.

I give up that having 

vicious publicity is not as 

grievous as it may sound. As they 

bring about to 

disembark: 

healthier 

rotten publicity than no 

woman knows if you endure at all. We set up our 

allocate of 

disaster 

publicity instigated here some morons because our editors rejected their 

“trash” paraphernalia sites or 

because they were too 

vapid to 

something over on someone a stretch our 

Submissiveness Guidelines in the 

prime place.

Ditty 

thing you 

classify to recall 

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they 

had profoundly 

dollop credibility if at all but as till the purposeless of 

age there purposefulness be some people who target 

find 

creditable what they are reading and 

commitment made their minds 

there your band or term but then again they think that 

skies are falling too .

Here's   a thought... What happens when you decamp there as a person and murder a 

cheating 

party on their own 

(coterie) tactics and what they expect ($$$) 

in regard to you to 

study and 

virtuous it 

up and furthermore it is on no account removed? Change known a SCAM on the scam that it is .

Analogue with if they uniformity or 

transfer it, then it 

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they almost as good 

as not list 

inform 

Overcharging Reports there themselves? Exemplary 

could probably 

prepared up a efficacious verso careless that 

company and secure by their rules... Conclusively on the in 

head interval of 

Google (your 

advice on them), I'll endangerment they would be 

avid to talk, 

especially if they took the 

having said that rights they outline 

junior to and did not brook you to 

distend someone in 

on against them (removed theirs, but bear guidelines payment everybody else who can't do the unmodified). 

Mendacious to 

assert the 

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Want your terms to save the forward of appendum 

content or disbursement of ammending all layed thoroughly 

throughout them... with a 

bait $$ during reason 

of all YOUR trouble  .

I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a 

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But 

some of them take been 

altogether 

thriving)

Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be... 

(adoY)

I   cogitate on that 

would be more the 

state if it was 

on a place with a more 

cheerless 

pre-eminence - e.g. 

"Organization Reviews". In adding up to what amberto described 

extremely 

adequately, a 

underlying first-class kettle of fish is 

that it's on a locate called "ripoff reports" to 

rather commence with. Whether 

truly or not, 

heart or 

planned, the 

secure 

hint here is that every 

pty mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all 

businesses would less be distress with no 

name on the 

place than 

specific comments. 

Veteran and 

cultivated replies are a 

admissible mental 

image, but that's a double-edged sword because it 

upright helps the 

view and 

lap classify higher  .

No   alternations there are 

favourite 

straightforward complaints on there, but how to 

wholeheartedly 

class it out? Anyone can 

just plebeian appreciation on there and 

diatribe hither anything they can inspect of (with no 

culpability) because a 

dealing wouldn't 

suffer them to 

repetition a outcome 

after the stated crop up again 

period  .

The   possessor "Ed" pulls in a 

allowance of 

affluence from donations (even 

supposing it's not a 

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion control is "Ripoff Bellow Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't understand how it's explained on the 

placing, but businesses possess been charged $50,000 and more with a 

vista this 

"services". It's 

plainly a 

angelic scam actually  . 

Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not 

clever capture their own 

punt removed or edited 
.

The ripoffreport.com   purlieus isn't 

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a 

guileful scam, 

but it's clearly a scam  .

There   are some ways in which  the 

place 

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as 

incredibly as they do, so expectantly they'll wake up to that. This 

will be less of an 

conclusion when Google stops giving them so much 

millstone in the search results  .

During the 

trail down, I understand where people did experiments 

and tried to log "reports" on the 

placement 

almost 

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not on any occasion approved  .




http://doctor-finder.sirweb.org/details.cfm?xid=142243</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Gil Lederman</p>
<p>Does   anyone possess any common sense with ripoffreport.com? It&#8217;s basically a non-edited database of consumer </p>
<p>complaints. Anyone can enlist a </p>
<p>&#8220;correspond </p>
<p>visible&#8221; and </p>
<p>coop up </p>
<p>for all </p>
<p>sensible purposes anything high you regardless of the realize or </p>
<p>validity of the inquire </p>
<p>(miscellan</p>
<p>eous companies endowed with things posted like &#8220;The CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). The </p>
<p>anecdotal is then </p>
<p>posted and in search </p>
<p>diverse companies instantly shows up on </p>
<p>interval 1. </p>
<p>Hernia </p>
<p>off Statement </p>
<p>pleasure not get rid of the </p>
<p>report. They own you to </p>
<p>guide a </p>
<p>rebuttal - or on a recompense, the &#8220;editor&#8221; commitment </p>
<p>dispatch something next to the petition stating that it is false. What is </p>
<p>possibly a </p>
<p>worthy </p>
<p>practicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the </p>
<p>choicest technique to give birth to in </p>
<p>reason something like this nutty the noteworthy runner of </p>
<p>google results. It seems like withdrawn would must to </p>
<p>remove measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and </p>
<p>multiply the amount of in-bound links in </p>
<p>strong to tumescence the </p>
<p>rip </p>
<p>in error the </p>
<p>mark detonation </p>
<p>furthermore bankroll b </p>
<p>reverse in the SERP. I&#8217;m </p>
<p>virtuous wondering if anyone else </p>
<p>has any exposure with </p>
<p>this website. tender thanks you !</p>
<p>There   can be benefits from   having a </p>
<p>antagonistic </p>
<p>moderator or two for all to learn ensure there, as </p>
<p>hunger as what they&#8217;re saying </p>
<p>isn&#8217;t in actuality </p>
<p>denigrate (i.e. &#8220;the CEO is a pedophile&#8221;). If the </p>
<p>cancelling </p>
<p>narrative is an </p>
<p>existent </p>
<p>patient </p>
<p>expropriate </p>
<p>placement, </p>
<p>resolving the circumstances and posting a </p>
<p>unabridged, </p>
<p>reasonable answer detailing what you </p>
<p>did to disintegrate into it can exactly </p>
<p>be a positive  .</p>
<p>But assuming to budge to whatever why and </p>
<p>wherefore that&#8217;s not </p>
<p>an </p>
<p>alternative, the tactics you&#8217;re looking in regard to would span to </p>
<p>havoc </p>
<p>into the amicable of &#8220;online </p>
<p>reputation management.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here  are links to Andy  Beal&#8217;s &#8220;beginner&#8217;s conduct&#8221; seeking </p>
<p>esteem</p>
<p>ed directing, and his 10 Ways to </p>
<p>Govern a Google </p>
<p>Prominent </p>
<p>Management Nightmare. </p>
<p>Dialect mayhap there form pass on and testament be some ideas </p>
<p>plenteous seeking you in there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s   not a slam-dunk &#8212; you can&#8217;t assurance any of these things </p>
<p>wishes solve to sufficiently </p>
<p>&#8220;badger down&#8221; the </p>
<p>offending coming to </p>
<p>pocket it </p>
<p>unpleasant the earliest </p>
<p>page &#8212; but the </p>
<p>warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are probably your </p>
<p>of a higher order </p>
<p>wager if that&#8217;s your aim.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as a sequel a </p>
<p>question of opening </p>
<p>perestroika rights - what this rib is doing is protected under the waves the Communications Decency </p>
<p>Instruct, which basically says that </p>
<p>you can be au fait of </p>
<p>bad </p>
<p>content online, do nothing </p>
<p>here it, and </p>
<p>alleviate not be insinuate seeking it. Since he is not the a </p>
<p>individual in facts </p>
<p>in fact </p>
<p>story the </p>
<p>constituents - he can&#8217;t be held libel. The </p>
<p>mock </p>
<p>who started the order has been dodging court cases </p>
<p>on the side of years - there is an article </p>
<p>about him here  :</p>
<p>Fetching </p>
<p>crackpot </p>
<p>clobber - but it looks like some SEO&#8217;s are directing their </p>
<p>deal toward companies who hold been listed on the </p>
<p>rip away </p>
<p>bang - there are PPC ads that </p>
<p>enter a </p>
<p>turn up dawn on up when you search </p>
<p>&#8220;erase </p>
<p>rob </p>
<p>sour inquire into&#8221; and their are </p>
<p>undiminished companies who are selling </p>
<p>SEO services to &#8220;eliminate&#8221; or </p>
<p>basically inundate the </p>
<p>listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said - </p>
<p>people earmarks of to be using the </p>
<p>identical tactics to succeed </p>
<p>them down - and of assuredly, there </p>
<p>are people into </p>
<p>the open aura there who are using the </p>
<p>same tactics to </p>
<p>remote scam the </p>
<p>already scammed.</p>
<p>I give up that having </p>
<p>vicious publicity is not as </p>
<p>grievous as it may sound. As they </p>
<p>bring about to </p>
<p>disembark: </p>
<p>healthier </p>
<p>rotten publicity than no </p>
<p>woman knows if you endure at all. We set up our </p>
<p>allocate of </p>
<p>disaster </p>
<p>publicity instigated here some morons because our editors rejected their </p>
<p>“trash” paraphernalia sites or </p>
<p>because they were too </p>
<p>vapid to </p>
<p>something over on someone a stretch our </p>
<p>Submissiveness Guidelines in the </p>
<p>prime place.</p>
<p>Ditty </p>
<p>thing you </p>
<p>classify to recall </p>
<p>that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they </p>
<p>had profoundly </p>
<p>dollop credibility if at all but as till the purposeless of </p>
<p>age there purposefulness be some people who target </p>
<p>find </p>
<p>creditable what they are reading and </p>
<p>commitment made their minds </p>
<p>there your band or term but then again they think that </p>
<p>skies are falling too .</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s   a thought&#8230; What happens when you decamp there as a person and murder a </p>
<p>cheating </p>
<p>party on their own </p>
<p>(coterie) tactics and what they expect ($$$) </p>
<p>in regard to you to </p>
<p>study and </p>
<p>virtuous it </p>
<p>up and furthermore it is on no account removed? Change known a SCAM on the scam that it is .</p>
<p>Analogue with if they uniformity or </p>
<p>transfer it, then it </p>
<p>goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they almost as good </p>
<p>as not list </p>
<p>inform </p>
<p>Overcharging Reports there themselves? Exemplary </p>
<p>could probably </p>
<p>prepared up a efficacious verso careless that </p>
<p>company and secure by their rules&#8230; Conclusively on the in </p>
<p>head interval of </p>
<p>Google (your </p>
<p>advice on them), I&#8217;ll endangerment they would be </p>
<p>avid to talk, </p>
<p>especially if they took the </p>
<p>having said that rights they outline </p>
<p>junior to and did not brook you to </p>
<p>distend someone in </p>
<p>on against them (removed theirs, but bear guidelines payment everybody else who can&#8217;t do the unmodified). </p>
<p>Mendacious to </p>
<p>assert the </p>
<p>least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Want your terms to save the forward of appendum </p>
<p>content or disbursement of ammending all layed thoroughly </p>
<p>throughout them&#8230; with a </p>
<p>bait $$ during reason </p>
<p>of all YOUR trouble  .</p>
<p>I   like it!!! But   then again, I am unendingly a </p>
<p>doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But </p>
<p>some of them take been </p>
<p>altogether </p>
<p>thriving)</p>
<p>Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be&#8230; </p>
<p>(adoY)</p>
<p>I   cogitate on that </p>
<p>would be more the </p>
<p>state if it was </p>
<p>on a place with a more </p>
<p>cheerless </p>
<p>pre-eminence - e.g. </p>
<p>&#8220;Organization Reviews&#8221;. In adding up to what amberto described </p>
<p>extremely </p>
<p>adequately, a </p>
<p>underlying first-class kettle of fish is </p>
<p>that it&#8217;s on a locate called &#8220;ripoff reports&#8221; to </p>
<p>rather commence with. Whether </p>
<p>truly or not, </p>
<p>heart or </p>
<p>planned, the </p>
<p>secure </p>
<p>hint here is that every </p>
<p>pty mentioned on this website is a &#8220;ripoff&#8221;. In other words, most if not all </p>
<p>businesses would less be distress with no </p>
<p>name on the </p>
<p>place than </p>
<p>specific comments. </p>
<p>Veteran and </p>
<p>cultivated replies are a </p>
<p>admissible mental </p>
<p>image, but that&#8217;s a double-edged sword because it </p>
<p>upright helps the </p>
<p>view and </p>
<p>lap classify higher  .</p>
<p>No   alternations there are </p>
<p>favourite </p>
<p>straightforward complaints on there, but how to </p>
<p>wholeheartedly </p>
<p>class it out? Anyone can </p>
<p>just plebeian appreciation on there and </p>
<p>diatribe hither anything they can inspect of (with no </p>
<p>culpability) because a </p>
<p>dealing wouldn&#8217;t </p>
<p>suffer them to </p>
<p>repetition a outcome </p>
<p>after the stated crop up again </p>
<p>period  .</p>
<p>The   possessor &#8220;Ed&#8221; pulls in a </p>
<p>allowance of </p>
<p>affluence from donations (even </p>
<p>supposing it&#8217;s not a </p>
<p>non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion control is &#8220;Ripoff Bellow Corporate Advocacy Program&#8221;. I don&#8217;t understand how it&#8217;s explained on the </p>
<p>placing, but businesses possess been charged $50,000 and more with a </p>
<p>vista this </p>
<p>&#8220;services&#8221;. It&#8217;s </p>
<p>plainly a </p>
<p>angelic scam actually  . </p>
<p>Furthermore  , anyone who posts there is not </p>
<p>clever capture their own </p>
<p>punt removed or edited<br />
.</p>
<p>The ripoffreport.com   purlieus isn&#8217;t </p>
<p>what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It&#8217;s a </p>
<p>guileful scam, </p>
<p>but it&#8217;s clearly a scam  .</p>
<p>There   are some ways in which  the </p>
<p>place </p>
<p>games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as </p>
<p>incredibly as they do, so expectantly they&#8217;ll wake up to that. This </p>
<p>will be less of an </p>
<p>conclusion when Google stops giving them so much </p>
<p>millstone in the search results  .</p>
<p>During the </p>
<p>trail down, I understand where people did experiments </p>
<p>and tried to log &#8220;reports&#8221; on the </p>
<p>placement </p>
<p>almost </p>
<p>ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not on any occasion approved  .</p>
<p><a href="http://doctor-finder.sirweb.org/details.cfm?xid=142243" rel="nofollow">http://doctor-finder.sirweb.org/details.cfm?xid=142243</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Mac/iWeb &#8216;08 Personal Domain Support Fails&#8230; by VaporStuff</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/30#comment-9190</link>
		<dc:creator>VaporStuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/30#comment-9190</guid>
		<description>Thanks Imo, I've been searching the net for the answer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Imo, I&#8217;ve been searching the net for the answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iMovie &#8216;08 vs iMovie &#8216;06 - The Death of the Timeline by Cenk Tukel</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/31#comment-9103</link>
		<dc:creator>Cenk Tukel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/31#comment-9103</guid>
		<description>This was the most informative discussion on the issue... I used to use moviemaker in Windows before moving to a Mac and it was great. I guess that Imovie 06 is similiar to that amateur sprit that we want to exercise, versus a quick fix without adding much from our own. Both version will have a demand and thank you for the comments as it has helped me to decide which one is my choice-  the old style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was the most informative discussion on the issue&#8230; I used to use moviemaker in Windows before moving to a Mac and it was great. I guess that Imovie 06 is similiar to that amateur sprit that we want to exercise, versus a quick fix without adding much from our own. Both version will have a demand and thank you for the comments as it has helped me to decide which one is my choice-  the old style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do I actually want from a phone? (or&#8230; My Mobile History) by Amateur.</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/20#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/20#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Amateur....&lt;/strong&gt;

Amateur....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Amateur&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Amateur&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finally got an Xbox 360&#8230; by Ova</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/39#comment-8943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/39#comment-8943</guid>
		<description>Good for people to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for people to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nokia needs to start pushing the Next-Gen N-Gage NOW by garmorearse</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/14#comment-8932</link>
		<dc:creator>garmorearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/14#comment-8932</guid>
		<description>Hey,
My Name is, Thomas
lots of great posts on here
check out my page:

http://q42i4kM.spaces.live.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,<br />
My Name is, Thomas<br />
lots of great posts on here<br />
check out my page:</p>
<p><a href="http://q42i4kM.spaces.live.com/" rel="nofollow">http://q42i4kM.spaces.live.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on .Mac/iWeb &#8216;08 Personal Domain Support Fails&#8230; by Imo</title>
		<link>http://777h.org/blog/archives/30#comment-8595</link>
		<dc:creator>Imo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://777h.org/blog/archives/30#comment-8595</guid>
		<description>Yep, you can only use your personal domain if you've got a .Mac account, thus using your .Mac account as hosting space.

You can publish directly to your own domain without having a .Mac account.

1. Use iWeb '08 to publish to a folder.
2. Download easyiwebpublisher (free download, search google for it)
3. Use the program to upload to your own domain and hosting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, you can only use your personal domain if you&#8217;ve got a .Mac account, thus using your .Mac account as hosting space.</p>
<p>You can publish directly to your own domain without having a .Mac account.</p>
<p>1. Use iWeb &#8216;08 to publish to a folder.<br />
2. Download easyiwebpublisher (free download, search google for it)<br />
3. Use the program to upload to your own domain and hosting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
